For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court determined that the Defendant changed the form and quality of each of the instant land by reclaiming earth and sand as indicated in the facts charged, and rejected the allegation in the grounds of appeal for misconception of facts and misapprehension of legal principles disputing such change.

The allegation in the grounds of appeal that misleads facts is merely a matter of dispute over the judgment of the court of fact-finding on the selection and probative value of evidence belonging to the free judgment of the court of fact-finding. In light of the evidence duly admitted, the aforementioned judgment of the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.