However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 1, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the port branch of the Daegu District Court on November 1, 2007, and a fine of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Chuncheon District Court on August 22, 201, respectively.

At around 22:05 on October 22, 2013, the Defendant, who had been punished twice or more due to drinking driving, driven a Brane vehicle under the influence of alcohol with approximately KRW 500m alcohol concentration of 0.134% from the day before the restaurant in the name of “Mapo-dong,” “Mapo-dong, Mapo-dong,” “Mapo-dong, Mapo-dong, Mapo-dong, Mapo-dong, Mapo-dong, Mapo-dong, Mapo-dong, Mapo-dong, Mapo-dong, 22:10 on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions indicated in the judgment: Criminal history records, repeated statements, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of Part IV of the summary order;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., the fact that the defendant acknowledges and reflects the crime, the fact that the defendant is limited to a simple driving and does not cause a traffic accident);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary mitigation)

1. Order to attend lectures or order to provide community service under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;