사문서변조등
Defendants are innocent.
1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant A is a person who engages in real estate leasing business of D in Gyeonggi-do, and Defendant B is a certified architect who operates an architect office with the trade name of E in South-Yyang-si, Gyeonggi-do.
A. Defendants’ joint act 1) The alteration of private document: (a) the purpose of Defendant A’s alteration is to report a road register on the Namyang-si’s land for the purpose of using H and I’s forest land for the construction of a warehouse in Nam-si, Nam-do; (b) around June 9, 2016, Defendant A entered the road register in the Gyeonggi-do JJ, which was first consented by H and I, with the size of 38.0 square meters in the road size confirmed at the time of the survey of the current status of Defendant B, and submitted the first cans to the Namyang-si, and keep the originals after the division survey was conducted with the size of 47.0 square meters and the size of the road size of 47.0 square meters and with the consent of H and I, Defendant A sent the originals kept in excess of the total size of 331 square meters; and (c) attached the road register with the size of 38.06 square meters on the road size of 16.06.06
As a result, the Defendants modified one copy of the road ledger, which is a private document on the rights and obligations, for the purpose of uttering.
2) On June 9, 2016, the Defendants engaged in the alteration of the document form: (a) as if one copy of the “road ledger” revised was a document duly formed by the H and I’s “road ledger” in the said revised name, the Defendants entered the cans, and then submitted it in electronic form for the viewing of Namyang-ju using the Internet sets table program related to construction permission.
B. Defendant A’s sole crime 1) The Defendant forged private documents H in relation to the new construction of Defendant A’s warehouse on the G land in Namyang-si, Namyang-do.