If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

At around 00:30 on September 9, 2017, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at “ENAEM” located in Heung-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, the Defendant, following the Victim F (hereinafter referred to as “ENEA”) was able to attract the victim, and rhife the victim’s vessel and the chest side by hand, and the Defendant committed an indecent act by force against the victim by bucking, plucking, and plouting, the victim’s own neck on the side of the Defendant, and making the victim fit with the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reporting on the arrest of a case;

1. Each police statement made to F, G, and H;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order;

1. In full view of various circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, occupation, family environment, social ties, criminal record and risk of recidivism, profits and preventive effects expected due to the instant disclosure order and notification order, disadvantages and side effects, etc., there are special circumstances in which the Defendant’s personal information may not be disclosed or notified.

In a case where a conviction becomes final and conclusive on the criminal facts in the judgment that are subject to registration and submission of new information, the Defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and is obligated to submit personal information to the competent agency pursuant to Article 43 of the same Act.

The reason for sentencing is that the defendant did not have the same record as the defendant, agreed with the victim, and recognized the error, but the drinking habits of the defendant was cut.

(2) Does.