However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 01:00 on September 5, 2013, the Defendant: (a) signed the “D”, a student of the Defendant, on the front side of the “Chyeong-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, and received a demand from the police officer of the Busan High Police Station to voluntarily conduct the act of larceny; (b) signed the “D” on the Defendant’s birth; and (c) forged the above D’s signature without authority for the purpose of exercising the right by stating “D” in the “person stating the suspect’s interrogation protocol,” after being examined at the criminal team office of the Busan High Police Station on the same day at around 02:58; and (d) submitted to the police officer who was aware of the fact that the private signature was forged and used each of the above D’s signature.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Voluntary written consent and protocol of suspect examination (one time);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (suspect A false personal information verification);

1. Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of private signature) and Article 239 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Considering circumstances, such as confession and reflection);