When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 17, 2020, the Defendant received a report on November 17, 2020 at the top of the convenience store in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and 112, stating that “no taxi driver shall provide guidance for the purpose without getting off or getting off the taxi,” and recommended the Defendant to return home from the E officer belonging to the Sungdong Police Station D police station in Sungdong-dong, Seoul.

Gabling Sicks, Sicks, Sicks

In addition to the theory, the part less than the right-hand part of E was just one time by drinking to the left hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Evidence List 3) in respective E and F statements;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include the fact that the defendant was punished once by a fine for violent crime; that the defendant is divided by his or her mistake; that the defendant committed assault against the police officer; and that the conditions for sentencing as shown in the trial process of this case, such as the degree of assault against the police officer; and the circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be comprehensively determined as the sentence as ordered.