2. In full view of the facts that the Defendant had multiple criminal records, including the same kind of crime, and committed each of the instant crimes during the period of repeated crimes, the number of victims, the amount of damage, and the failure to recover from damage, etc., the lower court’s sentencing appears to have been reasonably determined by fully considering all the circumstances, including the various sentencing grounds asserted by the Defendant, and there are no special circumstances to the extent that the sentencing is changed ex post facto, so the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.