부당이득금반환
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, KRW 18,944,200 against the Plaintiff as to the Defendant and its related amount, from May 22, 2014 to June 9, 2017.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and it is reasonable to accept the reasoning of this judgment in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The part pertaining to dismissal or additional determination
가. 고치는 부분 ▣ 제1심판결문 제3쪽 12행부터 18행까지를 다음과 같이 고침 『 2) 이에 따라 카드회사로부터 원고가 수주를 받는 경우에는 원고가 중소기업유통센터로부터 물품을 조달받아 카드회사로 납품하는 ‘중소기업유통센터 원고 카드회사’의 유통구조로 업무를 진행하고, 중소기업유통센터가 수주를 받는 경우에는 중소기업유통센터가 원고로부터 물품을 조달받아 카드회사로 납품하는 ‘원고 중소기업유통센터 카드회사’의 유통구조로 업무를 진행할 수도 있게 됨으로써, 이 사건 업무제휴협약을 통하여 원고와 중소기업유통센터는 누가 카드회사로부터 포인트몰 사업을 수주 받더라도 해당 거래에서 매출액을 확보하고 이윤을 얻을 수 있는 기회를 가질 수 있게 되었다
(After the conclusion of the instant business partnership agreement, the Plaintiff and the small and medium enterprise distribution center maintained the independent transaction, which received orders from each credit card company and did not allow the other party to participate in the subordinate distributor. However, it does not appear clearly in the record as to whether the actual transaction was made in the transaction made by the distribution structure in which both the Plaintiff and the small and medium enterprise distribution center participated, and as to the following, the transaction made by the distribution structure of the Plaintiff’s EL Card (LS), from July 2007 to October 201, was entirely processed.
』 ▣ 제1심판결문 제5쪽 8행부터 14행까지를 다음과 같이 고침 『 ⑤ 제5단계 : 원고는 납품업체인 D에 물품대금을 지급한 후...