교통사고처리특례법위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The main sentence of the lower court (two years of suspended execution in April of the imprisonment without prison labor) and incidental disposition (80 hours community service and 40 hours compulsory driving instruction) are too unreasonable.
2. The Defendant agreed with the victims, and recognized and reflected his mistake.
However, considering the fact that the Defendant has already been punished twice for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, the occupational negligence of the Defendant, the degree of injury of the victim D, and other various circumstances shown in the arguments in this case and the contents and time of the incidental disposition imposed on the Defendant, the lower court’s main sentence and incidental disposition are too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is rejected.
3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless.