When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 2, 2015, the Defendant appeared as a witness for a violation of the Agricultural Cooperative Act with respect to the Daejeon District Court No. 1, which is located in the Gyeyang-gu, Seosan-si, Seosan-si, Seosan-si, Seosan-si, and became a witness for the following testimony in the court No. 1, 2015.

The Defendant initially presented the proposal to send it to E Livestock Cooperatives in October 2014, or to the prosecutor’s question, “I have presented it from the beginning, if I would first give it in October 2014, or if I would give it in advance, and if I would give it in advance, I would like to present it from the beginning.”

“At first, the Defendant testified that D pre-execution of the cost of the promotional event and sent overseas travel to D before April 2014.”

However, the Defendant initially sent overseas travel from D before D, since he awarded a special promotional event at the end of ten months.

D. I would like to do.

The proposal was made by D. D. “The special event cost was executed in advance by requesting D. D. to be a problem in connection with the election of the head of the coastal association for April.” Even though C, the false statement was made for D.

The defendant, as a witness who has taken an oath under the law, such as the false statement as above, was presented with a false statement contrary to his memory.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement in F, G, and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the protocol of examination of witness, protocol of examination of witness and record of examination of witness;

1. Relevant Article 152 of the Criminal Act and Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act requires strict punishment as an offense that weakens the national judicial action by making it difficult to discover the substantial truth of a judicial institution.