For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court rendered a not-guilty verdict on the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds that there is no proof of the relevant crime, on the other hand, acquitted the Defendant on the ground that there is no proof of the crime, and acquitted the Defendant on the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents including the above facts charged, and

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the record, the aforementioned determination is justifiable. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the necessity of relief and the legal doctrine on injury in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.