부당해고구제재심판정취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of the lawsuit, including costs incurred by participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the decision on retrial;
A. The Plaintiff is a company that employs 100 regular workers and carries on bus transportation services.
The intervenor was employed by the plaintiff company on April 1, 2009 and served as a bus driver on June 17, 2008, and was employed as a bus driver on April 1, 2009, and is a member of the Korean Bus and Democratic Bus Trade Union (hereinafter “instant trade union”).
B. On March 27, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) held a personnel committee to operate a bus on April 18, 2013 without finding out any malfunction; (b) rejected the Intervenor to submit an explanatory note on the destruction of video devices installed in the bus (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 1”); (c) on May 22, 2013, the Plaintiff obstructed the Plaintiff’s access of the vehicle by putting small and medium sized studs in the entrance road of the Plaintiff company into the front door of the company, and by carrying out force-free demonstration with the outside (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 2”); and (d) on September 26, 2013, the Plaintiff failed to check the operation of the video device installed in the bus before operating the bus; (c) failed to find out of the malfunction; and accordingly, (d) failed to operate the bus during the operation of the bus, and (e) rejected the Plaintiff’s order to wear up to 3 minutes of the number of hours off the bus (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 3”).
(hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 5”) decided seven days of suspension from office due to the grounds for disciplinary action, and notified the intervenors on the same day.
(hereinafter “instant suspension from office”). C.
On April 1, 2014, an intervenor filed a request for review on the suspension from office of this case. The Review Personnel Committee rejected the Intervenor’s request for review on April 7, 2014.
An intervenor shall take April 8, 2014.