If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 03:00 on November 18, 2012, the Defendant: (a) requested the victim C (the aged 39) under the Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Underground to order the purchase price to be paid by deceiving the victim as if he did not have the intent or ability to pay the purchase price, even if he/she orders the purchase price to pay the purchase price to the victim; and (b) the Defendant acquired financial benefits equivalent to the above amount by failing to pay the purchase price to the victim, even though he/she was provided with alcohol and alcohol equivalent to 2.50,000 won, such as three Does, three Mari, twenty son, and one son.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of the receipt statute

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;