However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 17:00 on October 20, 2020, the Defendant discovered and caused the Defendant in front of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Seoul Dongdaemun Police Station D)’s auxiliary police officers E, and victim F, and requested the above restaurant operator to report to the above restaurant operator 119. After receiving a report on the dispatch of the 119 first aid service, the victim G was asked the Defendant about the status of the Defendant, and the victim E and the victim F were removed from the Defendant’s arms, and the above victim E and the victim F were removed from the Defendant’s arms, and the victim E and the victim F continued to keep the victim’s face part once with the victim’s left hand.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the fire fighters, thereby hindering the emergency service activities, and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of public order and order of auxiliary police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G, E, and F;

1. A report on the results of dispatch of a person who obstructs fire-fighting activities, and a log of emergency medical services activities;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a course photograph or a dynamic image photograph;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with the performance of each official duty), Article 50 subparagraph 1 (c) and Article 16 (2) (a point of interference with emergency medical services) of the Framework Act on Fire Services concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor as provided for in Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution.

1. An unfavorable circumstance is that it is not good to commit a crime committed by assaulting a police officer who found a defendant being used under the influence of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, who requested a 119 report, and a police officer who received the said report, and the fire-fighting crew member dispatched after receiving the said report.

Recognizing a single crime, it seems to reflect the fact that the defendant seems to have no particular criminal history, and the defendant is a contingent crime that occurred due to drinking.

In this situation, the defendant's person.