교육기관지정취소처분취소 등
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
3. The Defendant against the Plaintiff on January 5, 2015.
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation as to this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the addition or dismissal of the following two paragraphs. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Details to be added or rewritten in the part of reasons for the judgment in the first instance;
A. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (f) at the end of paragraph 1, the following is added.
On the other hand, the disposition against the plaintiff is summarized as shown in the attached Table.
B. The reasoning of the judgment of the first instance court is as follows: (a) the part of Article 1(a) of the “the illegality of the second disposition as of November 6, 2014 and the legality of the revocation of the instant B personnel’s disposition”; (b) the part of “the illegality of the second disposition as of November 6, 2014” in the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance court, which was added or modified to the item “the lawfulness of the revocation of the instant B personnel’s disposition”; (a) the part of “the illegality of the second disposition as of November 6, 2014” in the part of “the Plaintiff’s assertion,” which included “the illegality of the second disposition as of September 15, 2015”; and (b) the part of “the illegality of the second disposition as of November 6, 2014,” which included the following subparagraphs.
Article 27(2) [Attachment 6] [Attachment 6] of the Guidelines, and Article 27(2) [Attachment 1] of the Guidelines, where there are different criteria for each disposition corresponding to two or more violations, they shall comply with the heavier criteria for dispositions: Provided, That where two or more criteria for dispositions are the same and the same criteria for dispositions, it may be increased by up to 1/2 of the heavier criteria for dispositions within the scope not exceeding the total period of each criteria for dispositions.] If there are several violations, one administrative disposition is required without having the administrative disposition taken against each of such violations.
In addition, according to the administrative disposition criteria of the above [Attachment 6], the criteria of disposition aggravated than the time of the first violation shall be applied in the case of the second or third violation, and the criteria of disposition according to the frequency of the violation shall be the same for the last one year.