난민불인정결정취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The following facts: (a) on February 15, 2007, the date of entry into the Republic of Korea of the Republic of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea: (b) on May 27, 2016, the date of the application for refugee status status (C-3) (hereinafter “instant disposition”); (c) on September 19, 2016, there is no basis for recognizing that there is no sufficient ground for recognizing refugee status refusal: (a) there is no dispute that there is a
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a national of the Republic of the Philippines (hereinafter “the Philippines”).
around 2006, the Plaintiff was threatened by the members of the anti-government organization to join the organization.
Accordingly, the plaintiff has been in the Republic of Korea since he left the Philippines.
As such, the Plaintiff needs to be recognized as a refugee inasmuch as the Plaintiff’s return to the Philippines is likely to pose a threat from the anti-government organization.
B. Determination 1) Article 2 subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act defines refugee status as “any foreigner who is unable to be protected or does not want to be protected by the country of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, status as a member of a specific social group, or political opinion, or is a stateless foreigner who is unable to return to or does not want to return to the country in which he/she had resided before entering the Republic of Korea due to such fear.” 2) In full view of the evidence and evidence as mentioned in the evidence No. 3 as well as the following circumstances revealed by adding the purport of the pleading to the statement in the evidence No. 3, it is difficult to see that the Plaintiff “a well-founded fear of being injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion,” and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise, the disposition of this case for which the Plaintiff’
① The threat of the Plaintiff’s assertion that it received is.