If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

The Defendant is the owner of the forest and field C located in Si, and the victim D is the Ecridge, who owns the F and four lots adjoining the said forest and field, and operates the “G” in the same place.

The defendant raised a complaint to the above arboretum on the grounds that the believers of the above church were engaged in religious activities, such as praises and worship, while entering the arboretum, with the intent to set up obstacles on the access road to the arboretum located in the remaining defendant's forest and field, and control their access thereto

Accordingly, around March 31, 2013, the Defendant, at the entrance of the above access road, approximately 2.5m to 3m of the width of Dao-si, set up a wooden wing net, and installed a stone and a tree obstacle at the above road, and made it impossible for unspecified people to pass the road, including customers who visited the above arboretum.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the traffic of the above road and interfered with the operation of the arboretum of the victim by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of three Acts and subordinate statutes to the chief of a complaint, each investigation report, field investigation photographs;

1. Relevant Article 185 of the Criminal Act, Article 185 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.