도로법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
The summary of the facts charged in this case is that the defendant is a corporation for trucking transport business, etc., and around 02:10 on June 5, 1997, at the street, which is the 15.3km point of the Ansan- Line Highway, the defendant's employee, in relation to the defendant's business, B violated the restriction on the vehicle operation of the road management authority by operating the above truck loaded with the cargo of 10.7 tons of 10.7 tons of the 3 livestock, and 11.9 tons of the 4 livestock, which is loaded with the cargo of 10.9 tons of the 3 livestock.
However, the facts charged are crimes falling under Articles 86, 83(1)2, and 54(1) of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), and Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), and Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 14, Oct. 28, 2010; Article 2010Hun-Ga14,15,21,27,35,38,44,70 (merged) of the Constitutional Court Act (amended by Act No. 12597 of May 20, 2014). Accordingly, the facts charged in this case are retroactively invalidated under Article 47(2) of the former Constitutional Court Act. Thus, the defendant is not guilty under the former part of the Criminal Act.
It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.