If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The Defendant is a person who operates semiconductor parts and gold-type processing companies under the trade name of “C” in Si interesting City B.

Any person who has acquired a reproduction of a program made in violation of copyright of the program with the knowledge of such fact shall not use it for business purposes.

Nevertheless, from September 2015 to April 27, 2016, the Defendant established and used a master campaigns reproduction program, a copyrighted work of the Victim CNC Software (CNC.) and a master program, a copyrighted work of the Victim Track Inc., respectively, on the five computers used in the above C office from September 2015 to April 27, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant infringed on the copyright of the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Relevant Article 136 (2) 4 and Article 124 (1) 3 of the Copyright Act concerning facts constituting an offense and the choice of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;