20,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

The amount equivalent to the above additional collection charge.

The defendant is not a person handling narcotics.

A person other than a person handling narcotics shall not administer a psychotropic drug camblopon (one camopon; hereinafter referred to as "copon") or arrange for sale or purchase, etc.

1. At around 14:00 on February 2, 2015, the Defendant received KRW 100,000,000 from D’s residence in Yangju-si, with D’s request for scopon from D to scopon, and received KRW 100,000,000 from D’s scopon. On the same day, G was scopon or 100,000,000 for scopon in front of F stations in E at the same time in the same time as scopon, and delivered it to D at around 17:00 on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant assisted the trade of philophones.

2. After delivering approximately 0.1g of philophones to D as described in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant administered philophones by taking out and drinking blophones with 0.05g of philophones mixed with D, at the inside of the above residence of D.

3. On February 19, 2015, the Defendant administered philophones in the inner room of D’s residence, around 19:00, at D’s above residence, with a d’s d’ylphone-d’s d’ylphone-d’s d’s d’ylphone-d’s d’s d’s d’.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by the prosecution (second time);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes that contain some statements among copies of suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to D;

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Articles 4 (1), and 2 subparagraph 3 (b) (in cases of medication, Article 30 of the Criminal Act is added) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. for the Fact of crime, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The proviso to Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) has committed each of the crimes in this case during the period of probation, and the defendant is punished for the same crime.