When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is the owner of the D site and E site where the access road connected to the residence and contribution of Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon (2m wide) is located, and the Defendant displayed the aforementioned access road as soon as possible in the course of the survey of the said site on the ground that the Defendant displayed a public bath, etc., thereby interfering with the traffic of the above access road, which is a road through which many unspecified people pass, by installing a cement brick fence at a height of 4.6m and 1.35m high on August 6, 2017, around 17:50, the Defendant displayed a public bath, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of statutes concerning certified copies of real estate register, cadastral map certified copies, and field photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 185 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1248, Apr. 1, 2006) (see, 2008Da1248, Apr. 2