성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(13세미만미성년자준유사성행위)등
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is the victim D's assistance.
The Defendant committed the following crimes while his parents were living together with the victim from around July 30, 2013 to September 9, 2014, when the victim’s father from around November 2013 went to the victim’s home and became the victim’s children, including the victim, and entered the Defendant’s residence.
From the end of February 2014 to the beginning of March 2014, the Defendant committed a violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (a quasi-minor act under the age of 13) between the end of February 2014 to the beginning of March 2014, and committed an indecent act against the victim by using the victim’s urology during the new wall time on the ground that the victim’s urology (the age of 11 at the time of age) urged from the end of February 2014 to the beginning of March 2014 to the beginning of March 2014.
Therefore, although the defendant was broken by the victim's scam with his scam, the victim thought that the scam would be locked between the victim's scam, and the victim walked with the scam of the victim, then put the scam of the victim into the panty part of the victim's panty part, collect the scam of the defendant's hand, and then put the scam into the part of the victim's breast part in the victim's scam, and commit an indecent act against the victim by taking advantage of the victim's scambling condition.
B. On August 2014, the Defendant committed a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes committed by Police Officers) on or around 04:00 on August 2014, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim by taking advantage of the victim’s state of refusal to resist, by entering the victim’s room (the age of 12 at that time) under the said pretext, and inserting his hand into the victim’s inner part of the locker’s chest.
(c) around September 5, 2014.