2. Determination on the grounds for appeal

A. The summary of the facts charged is around 08:30 on February 25, 2018, the Defendant: (a) listened to the cruel by the Defendant on the ground that the Defendant was aware of the Defendant from the victim E (the age of 43) who was the head of the team at the construction site team leader at D’s oil tank rooftop of the cooperation company C in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, on the ground that the Defendant was aware of the Defendant; (b) he exceeded the safety diameter used by the victim; and (c) he saw off the victim’s face with his fingers, with his fingers, and laid down the victim’s safety level over the floor.

As a result, the defendant damaged the victim's reputation of other parts necessary for treatment for about two weeks.

B. In full view of the evidence duly admitted and examined, the lower court found the Defendant guilty on the charge in light of the victim’s specific and consistent statements as to the situation at the time of the instant case, and other witness’s statements and injury diagnosis.

C. In full view of the following circumstances, the judgment of the court below was just and there was no error of misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles in the judgment of the court below, since the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case, in full view of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below.

① The victim and the F witness of the instant case have consistently and consistently stated the details and progress of the instant case from the investigative agency to the instant court.