A. The Grand Asian Environment Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Tani Environment”) is the owner of B5 tons truck (hereinafter “the instant truck”). The Defendant is the driver of the instant truck as an employee of the Grand Asian Environment, and the Intervenor joining the Defendant is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the instant truck.

B. C operated a motor vehicle maintenance shop in the name of E industry company in the wife population D in Permitted-si, and the Chinese environment has been entrusted to the E industry company when the vehicle owned by C is broken down.

C. On April 5, 2011, the Defendant visited the E industry company to repair the brac trouble of the instant truck, and C around 11:42 on the same day, on the front part of the instant truck, puts the truck into the front part of the instant truck by using a oil voltage to maintain the instant truck, and requested the Defendant, who was followed by the truck while entering the following and was engaged in the work, to walk the stop on the instant truck.

Accordingly, the Defendant was seated on the instant truck, but was placed at one stop, and due to this, the truck in this case was set up in the future, and C left away from the floor to the bend.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.

C filed a lawsuit against the Defendant, the Intervenor, and the ASEAN environment claiming compensation for damages arising from the instant accident.

[Defendant 1] In the above case, Defendant 2013Gadan50400 damages claim as to the truck in this case was at fault of C, and Defendant 1 asked Defendant to walk the Dong on the truck in this case. In light of such negligence, Defendant as tort, Defendant as the insurer, and Defendant’s environment as Defendant’s employer jointly and severally, set off 60% of the fault ratio of C out of the damages caused by the accident in this case.