However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 27, 2016, at around 08:20, the Defendant assaulted the victim D(36) who delivered the chemical exchange and the chemical exchange with “C” located in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Suwon-si B, Suwon-si, as a place for the settlement room of the nine floors of the instant food hall, and assaulted the victim’s breath, such as flading the breath, and flading the bridge.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the protocol of statements made in the course of making the warning to D;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (The favorable circumstances of sentencing) - The Defendant committed the instant crime without edification improvement despite having been sentenced several times to a fine for the same kind of crime. The favorable circumstances - the degree of use of the Defendant’s physical power should be considered. The victim also has contributed to the motive of the crime. The sentencing is ordered in consideration of all the conditions of sentencing revealed in the trial process in each of the above circumstances.