If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On June 6, 2015, at around 06:05, the Defendant arrived at the 26th regular taxi station in Ansan-gu, Ansan-si, the destination of which was a taxi, but was under the influence of alcohol, but was diving from the top of the taxi.

A victim C who was waiting for a taxi in the taxi stops tried to get a taxi, but the defendant was not getting out of the taxi.

At this time, the taxi driver considered that he can help the victim", and the victim said that the victim "Isn't have to drank in his house," and said that the victim "Isn't have to do so."

The Defendant, who was broken off from a taxi, was hicked by a knick, was frighted by a knick, led the said victim’s timber into alley, flicked with a balle, and flicked with a balle, and attempted to hick the victim’s eye with his finger.

As a result, the defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as bodily injury, which requires about 14 days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to damaged parts of photographs and written diagnosis of injury;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order: A favorable circumstance, such as that the defendant, under the influence of alcohol, has inflicted an injury on the victim's eye, etc. who is the second grade of high school, and that the same criminal record has been held once, etc.: The defendant's mistake is against the defendant; the defendant's mistake is agreed with the victim; the victim's injury was not excessive; the victim's injury was not excessive; and there was no criminal record exceeding the same criminal record and fine after the day of 2004. All other factors for sentencing under Article 51