Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

A sales broker of electrical appliances and an agent for the purchase and import of electrical appliances shall not intermediate the sale of electrical appliances subject to safety confirmation without any indication of safety confirmation report, etc. nor purchase or import them by proxy.

Nevertheless, from March 31, 2016 to April 5, 2016, in collusion with B, the Defendant ex officio corrected part of the facts charged to the extent that it does not interfere with the Defendant’s exercise of the right of defense under the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, to the extent that it does not interfere with the Defendant’s exercise of the right of defense.

After posting a letter on the website of the Internet purchasing agency jointly operated by the Defendant and B to act for the purchase of "Sama 2", the electrical appliances subject to safety verification without being marked the safety verification report, and then buying "Sama 2" on behalf of the buyers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B (including the statement part of the accused);

1. Printeds on the D website;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the written accusation;

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Safety Control of Electrical Appliances and Articles 25-5-2 and 14 (3) of the Act on the Safety Control of Criminal Records (Selection of Fines);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;