However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who has violated the prohibition on driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on February 10, 2008 by driving a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.083% on July 18, 2009 and with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.117% on July 18, 2009 at least twice.

At around 00:03 on September 8, 2013, the Defendant driven B rocketing car with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.212% under the influence of alcohol on the front of the Jin-dong Office located in the Jin-dong Office located in the Jin-dong.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the situation of running a motor vehicle under consideration, report on detection of a motor vehicle under consideration, report on the status of a motor vehicle under consideration, and report on the results of the crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports (A), investigation reports (report on confirmation of the same criminal records), summary orders, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing judgment;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 53 and considering all the circumstances, including the fact that he/she commits an illegal act and the fact that he/she

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary Mitigation);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act or more of orders to provide community service and attend lectures;