A shall be punished by a fine of 700,000 won, and a fine of 300,000 won, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

The Defendants are between Defendant B and the victim D, female, and 38 years of age, while living in the same house, and they are married.

On March 29, 2015, at around 4:35, at around 4:35, 2015, Defendants were punished as a matter of divorce with the victim at the multiples located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, and 2, and the victim’s face was expressed at the time of the victim’s face with the cellular phone in which the victim’s face was taken at one time with the victim’s arms and hand. According to Defendant B’s legal statement of the victim’s chest on drinking, Defendant B is not “the chest part” of Defendant B’s assault and assault, but rather the middle part between Defendant B’s left chest and the chest and the left shoulder.

Therefore, within the extent that it does not interfere with the defendants' exercise of their right to defense, the damaged parts are specified as above without any changes in the separate indictment.

at the time of several times, the notice was given.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. D's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. D’s photograph (in light of the above evidence and the circumstances at the time, it is difficult to view that Defendant A’s behavior constitutes “self-defense”. This part of the assertion is not acceptable) of the law.

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crimes concerned;

1. Defendant A: fine of KRW 700,000 [former summary - fine of KRW 2 million]: Defendant B: fine of KRW 300,000 (former summary - fine of KRW 1 million] common to the Defendants: ① The background leading up to the instant crime; ② the background leading up to the instant crime; ② in particular, Defendant B and the victim only maintain a marital relationship in the form of a couple, and they do not have any actual marital life (the Defendant B only requests extension of the period of stay, and there is no living together or any ties with the victim’s request for extension of the period of stay). Accordingly, Defendant B is subject to the change.