도로법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. The summary of the facts charged in this case, B, an employee of the Defendant, was in violation of the road management authority’s restriction on vehicle operation by running the Defendant’s vehicle in a state loaded with freight exceeding 11.83 tons of 10 tons of 10 tons of the limitation on the roads of the Korea Highway Corporation at a point of 29.18 km from May 2, 2005, at the end of 19.18 km in front of the grain business office.
2. As to Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), which is a joint penal provision among the applicable provisions to the facts charged in this case, the Constitutional Court rendered a decision on Oct. 28, 2010 that "where an agent, employee or other employee of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the corporation's business, the corporation shall be punished by a fine under Article 83 (1) 2 of the Act shall also be punished by the Constitution, and the part of the above Article 47 (2) of the Constitutional Court Act (amended by Act No. 7832 of Oct. 28, 2010) shall retroactively lose its effect pursuant to the proviso to Article 47 (2) of the Constitutional Court Act.
3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.