beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.05.08 2014고정1574

교통사고처리특례법위반등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On July 11, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”) driven a motor vehicle of Aburged Aburged C while drinking, and driven the four-lane road in front of the National Bank, located in 1036 at the ebbbbs of the ebscopic intersection from the ebscopic intersection to the ebscopic intersection.

At the time, the Defendant was at night and the Defendant was under the influence of the vehicle stopped, so there was a duty of care to check and drive the front left by the driver of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and was negligent in driving in the vicinity of the Eststynael driven by the victim D while driving the string part of the car driving by the Defendant with the front pentel part of the car driving by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim D due to the above occupational negligence, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

2. On July 11, 2014, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (e.g., refusal of measurement) and received a report under paragraph (1) from the Defendant, who was making an accident under paragraph (1), while driving a ebbburt vehicle in the lower direction of the ebbbbbbbbban-dong at the ebbbbbbbban-on on July 11, 2014, and received a report, and called out after receiving the report. The Defendant was required to comply with the alcohol measurement for about 30 minutes on the ground that there is a considerable reason to recognize that the Defendant was driven while under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking on the face, by making the red-light belt, etc.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not comply with the police officer's request for alcohol testing without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement and his defense counsel asserts that the defendant did not refuse to take a drinking test;

The following video data are recorded in the process of measuring the alcohol level for the accused.