When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

[Criminal Power] On September 5, 2013, the Defendant was ordered to suspend indictment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Ulsan District Prosecutors' Office.

【Criminal Facts】

On July 2, 2020, at around 11:57, the Defendant driven an altima vehicle while under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.05 km alcohol concentration of about 0.054% in the section of approximately 1.5 km to the roads adjacent to C in North-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Report on the result of crackdown on drinking driving and on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver;

1. Each photograph;

1. Previous convictions indicated in the judgment: Relevant provisions of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records and investigation reports (verification of the same criminal records as suspects); and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (Article 148-2 (1) of the Act on the Election of Criminal Crimes (Article 148-2 (1) and 44 of the Selection of Fines) (Article 148-2 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (Article 148-2 (1) of the same Act (Article 14 of the Election of Fines

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;