(a) Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months;

(b) however, for a period of two years from the date this ruling became final and conclusive.

Defendant

A is a screen race track with the trade name "D" in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and the second floor, and Defendant B is an employee of the horse race track with the screen.

1. No one who occupies the provision of a game product not classified as a rating shall provide the distribution or use of the game product not classified as a rating by the Game Rating Committee;

Nevertheless, in collusion with E as an employee, the Defendants provided game products that were not classified by the Game Rating Board, including 28, monitoring28, sn beamline, etc. in the area of 111.53 square meters in the screen screen from March 19, 2013 to March 21, 2013. The Defendants provided game products not classified by the Game Rating Board.

2. No one shall arrange for the exchange or exchange of intangible results obtained through the use of game products;

Nevertheless, in collusion with E, the Defendants exchanged 10,00 won per 200 points that an unspecified number of customers obtained by using the “D” horse game at the above temporary location.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of E and G;

1. Each statement in H, I, J, K, L, M, F, N,O, and P;

1. Investigation report (calculated and reported on the amount of additional collection charge);

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the internal photograph or lease contract of a game room;

1. Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 1 and 7 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Defendant A who is selected to impose imprisonment: Defendant B who is selected to impose a fine; and

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act;