However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

The Defendant is a person working as the manager of the E shopping mall management body located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and AlbnBBB1 is the owner of the 39 stores of the first floor of the said shopping mall, and around January 27, 201, the victim F Co., Ltd. entered into a lease agreement with the said company AlbnbBB1 and the said 39 stores on the first floor of the shopping mall. On January 28, 2011, the above E shopping mall 1,2,5, and the lessee who entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant and the owners of each floor, established a public relations center on the first floor of the said E shopping mall from the beginning of March 201 to December 4, 2011, and operated the above public relations center and recruited shop occupants.

1. On September 1, 201, the Defendant: (a) at the first floor public relations center of the said E shopping mall between the police officer of the lower court on September 10, 2011; (b) at the first floor public relations center of the said E shopping mall; (c) at around 30 minutes of electricity entering the said public relations center, the Defendant prevented the victim from performing his/her duties to recruit occupants.

2. From October 19, 201 to around the 21st day of the same month, the Defendant: (a) at the public relations center of the first floor of the shopping mall in question, the Defendant prevented the victim from performing the business of soliciting the occupants by blocking approximately five hours of household electricity by the aforementioned method.

3. On November 201, 201, the Defendant, at the promotion center for the first floor of the shopping mall, obstructed electricity for approximately 2-3 days, thereby preventing the victim from performing duties of soliciting the occupants.

Ultimately, the Defendant interfered with the business of soliciting the occupants by force as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness H, I and J;

1. Each prosecutor's statement to H, I, and J;

1. Determination as to the defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion of the protocol of interrogation of prosecutor's suspect G

1. There is no less than a single-class promotional officer for the first floor as alleged in the facts charged, and the defendant did not give G a short-term instruction as well.

2. We examine the evidence as seen earlier.