2. The facts that the defendant led to the confession and reflect of each of the crimes of this case are favorable to the defendant. However, the fraud of this case is not a reason for mitigation of punishment in light of the fact that the defendant entices a number of victims under the name of amusement park investment money, and the crime of fraud of this case is very poor, and the total amount of the defraudation exceeds 280 million won, and the escape for 12 years after departure from Korea immediately after the crime was committed, and the defendant escaped for 12 years, and the circumstance that the defendant voluntarily surrenders does not constitute mitigation of punishment;

In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the victims have not been paid any damage up to the trial; (b) the Defendant forged a certificate of registration cancellation of a motor vehicle over 36 times during flight; and (c) other circumstances, such as the character, conduct, age, family relationship, motive, circumstance, means and consequence of the crime; and (d) the sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.