For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendants on the charge of this case on the ground that there was no proof of crime.

In light of the record, the lower court did not err in its judgment by misapprehending the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on “a person who administers another’s business” under the crime of breach of trust, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.