소유권말소등기
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.
The purport of the claim and the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning the instant case is as follows, except for the modification of Article 1-A of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to the Defendant in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court’s explanation as to the instant case is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
A. On October 16, 2002, with respect to the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F.26.7 square meters (hereinafter “instant real estate”), the ownership was transferred on October 13, 2002 to the Plaintiff on the ground of sale on October 13, 2002. However, on the ground of the final judgment of the Seoul Central District Court 2012Ga group 268893 (hereinafter “the final judgment of the first instance court”) rendered against Defendant D, the ownership was transferred on May 3, 2016 on the ground of the said final judgment of the first instance court (hereinafter “the judgment of the first instance court”).
Act
2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.