On April 1, 2014, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Daegu District Court (Seoul District Court), which was located in Mansan-dong at the time of resident stay, and took an oath, such as the violation of the Road Traffic Act (or the measurement of drinking), against 2013 High Court No. 217 C, and testified.

In fact, the Defendant testified that “I am on November 1, 2013 at the time of the accident and there was no fact that the Defendant did not contact C at the time of the accident, and that there was no fact that he did not go to the place of the accident,” and that the attorney asked “I am to the point that Defendant C would go at the time of the incident on November 1, 2013,” and “I am to the point of the vehicle in which the accident occurred on the other side.”

Accordingly, the defendant made a false testimony against his memory.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to copies of trial records (court records and protocol of examination of witness);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. There is no history of criminal punishment against the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (the punishment to be postponed: fine of KRW 700,000 per day, detention in a workhouse: KRW 100,000 per day, and circumstances favorable to the reasons for sentencing below).

The defendant has been repented in depth, and the testimony of the defendant does not affect the trial, and there are no circumstances to consider the circumstances leading to the defendant in this case.

In addition, in light of the various circumstances favorable to the defendant, the sentence will be suspended for the defendant.