사해행위취소
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
1. The reasoning of the court concerning this case, such as the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance, is the same as that of the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following addition, thereby citing it as it is by the main sentence of Article 420
After the 9th page 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance, “I amb,” the following is added: “I amb, A, as a claim for damages arising from illegal loans, etc. even after the provisional seizure of this case, applied for provisional seizure against C’s claims, such as insurance money, etc. (Seoul District Court 201Kahap490), and in light of this, it is difficult to conclude that the above bank, at the time of the application for provisional seizure of this case, grasped all the details of the active property C at the
After the statement of the 14th 10th 10th 10th 1 of the judgment of the first instance court, the defendant added "(On the other hand, the defendant does not merely support the economic activities of C or bear household labor, but also argued to the effect that since 1992, the defendant directly became a member of the Chungcheong North Korean Ginseng Cooperative and contributed to the acquisition of each real estate, etc. listed in the separate sheet by independently managing the ginseng farmer, but most (71 out of 78 real estate) of the real estate listed in the separate sheet are acquired before 192, and thus, the defendant's above assertion is difficult to accept)."
2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.