If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

In the indictment, although the defendant is written as an employee of the "Curel", the defendant and the above Maurel business owner argued that the defendant are not a employee but a temporary help the defendant to work for the reasons of D on the day of this case, and there is no other evidence to confirm that the defendant has been employed by D and worked for the above Mour.

Whether or not the defendant is an employee is a circumstance that does not affect the establishment of the crime in violation of the Juvenile Protection Act, and the defendant recognizes the fact that the defendant provides a place of mixed accommodation. Therefore, this part of the crime is deleted ex officio and changed.

No one shall engage in any business activity that disturbs public morals, such as making male and female juveniles lodge together, or provide a place for such business activity.

Nevertheless, around 02:00 on April 18, 2018, the Defendant provided E (20) and F (17 years of age) of a minor person as a guest to “Curel, a accommodation business establishment in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City B, with both gender and gender accommodation.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes of the Act and subordinate statutes of the Act and subordinate statutes of the Act and subordinate statutes of the Act and subordinate statutes, such as the detection of and reporting on the suspected case of violation of the Act and the Act and subordinate statutes (including the Act and subordinate statutes of the Act and subordinate statutes);

1. Article 58 subparagraph 5 of the relevant Act and Article 30 subparagraph 8 of the Juvenile Protection Act, the selection of fines for criminal facts, and the selection of fines for negligence;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;