beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.08.24 2017고단1667

특수절도

Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, the defendants are above two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 22, 2017, the Defendants discovered the fact that the victim F, who used the game, was in the EPC room located in Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, and discovered about about KRW 3,570,00,00 in the market price, and pretended to confirm stolen damage, and conspired to steal the victim's property by means of escape.

Defendant

A approaching the victim in the above PC room, “I am out of the PC room because there is a talk that I would be a locked talk,” and the victim was out of the PC room, and Defendant B got out of the PC park near the PC room, and the victim “I am away from the two PC park near the two PC room, so I am similar to the one between the two.

In addition, a person who steals gold gals in Daejeon changed the gold gal from Daejeon to the gold galm, and the same is equal to the gold galm that he borrowed.

There is a gold with the knowledge of the inside of the Republic of Korea, and the defendant "a person who reports the confirmation," and the defendant A referred to as "a person who goes against the opposite," and the defendant A slicked the dog, and slicked at the end of the defendant B.

The Defendants: (a) induced the victim as above; (b) moved the H in Seocheon-gu G, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu; (c) Defendant B, as if the victim was aware of the theft-related items by entering the victim’s H, got out of the site after having dried the franchis from the victim; and (d) Defendant A, who was asked the victim where the victim would be what he would be, was, had the victim “I would have to confirm the franchis”; (c) prevented the victim from going through Defendant B; and (d) left the site, as Defendant B was not related to Defendant B.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to F and I;

1. The scene of the case and CCTV photographs;

1. Goods damaged;