2. On the other hand, vehicles operated by the defendant are covered by a comprehensive insurance, and the degree of injury to the victim C, H, and E due to the accident in this case is not much serious;

However, the defendant's central intrusion caused serious injury to the victim G, and the defendant has not made a separate effort to recover the victims' damage, and the defendant has already been punished once due to traffic accidents and violation of the Road Traffic Act (not after the accident).

In addition, comprehensively taking account of various circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, environment, character and conduct, and circumstances after committing the crime, the lower court’s sentence is not deemed unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit. Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.