2. In full view of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, including the fact that the defendant reflects his mistake, that the defendant's family and branch members are trying to return to the normal society, etc., and the fact that there seems to be clear social ties between the defendant's social ties, or narcotics are harmful to the social and national soundness due to their toxicity, so it is highly necessary to strictize narcotics-related crimes; the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case where he purchases and administers phiphonephones even though the defendant had already been punished for the same kind of crime, and other factors such as the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence, etc., various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence before and after the crime, and the scope of recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court sentencing committee, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.