임차료 등
1. The first instance judgment, including the claims expanded and reduced in this Court, shall be amended as follows:
(i).
1. The summary of the case and the facts premised on the case
A. The summary of the instant case pertains to the Plaintiff’s claim for payment of KRW 12,945,254,703, including rent, etc., by asserting that the Plaintiff did not receive rent, facility management entrustment cost, value-added tax, taxes and public charges, and facility management expenses, while leasing a commercial building to the Defendant under a lease agreement with the Defendant.
The judgment of the court of first instance accepted a set-off claim against the plaintiff, with the claim for return of unjust enrichment equivalent to 25 billion won against the plaintiff, which falls under the lease period exceeding 20 years against the plaintiff, and dismissed all the plaintiff's claim. The plaintiff and the defendant appealed against this claim, and thereafter the defendant withdrawn the appeal by this court.
(B) The plaintiff revised the amount of facility management fees in this court, excluded the portion of television receiving fees from the tax and public charges claims, and added the amount of late payment in proportion to the rate of 17% per annum as stipulated in the lease agreement, thereby expanding and reducing the claim.
전제된 사실관계 【증거】갑1에서 5, 44, 45, 46, 52, 53, 269, 270, 을2, 10, 20, 23, 24와 변론 전체의 취지 ⑴ 원고와 피고의 상가건물에 관한 임대차계약 ㈎ 원고는 2004. 7. 16. 피고와 사이에 피고에게 당시 ㈜대우건설이 신축 중이던 서울 서대문구 B 등 지상건물(C역사, 이하, ‘C역사’라 한다) 중 판매 및 업무시설인 지상 1, 2층 일부(522평 중 165평)와 지상 3, 4, 5층(4,255평 전체) 및 주차장을 피고의 영업개시일로부터 30년간 판매 및 업무시설 부분에 관하여 일시불 차임 750억 원(부가가치세 별도), 주차장 부분에 관하여 보증금 2억 5,000만 원에 월차임(매월 분할납부금) 91,667,000원(부가가치세 별도, 5년 단위 10%씩 인상)에 임대하기로 하는 내용의 임대차계약을 체결하였다.
㈏...