However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 2, 2012, around 18:10, the Defendant heard from the victim E (the age of 54) the phrase “it is not a place where the vehicle is parked.” On July 2, 2012, the Defendant expressed that “I will not park the vehicle,” and that “I would like to do so, I would like to walk the part where I would like to walk the victim’s right edges of the road.” On July 2, 2012, the Defendant saw the victim as “I would like to walk the part where I would like to walk the victim’s right edges of the road.” On about 3-4 occasions, I would like to inflict an injury on the victim, such as a non-fringing so that I would need approximately eight weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each general medical certificate;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 257 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see the following reasons for sentencing)

1. The defendant asserts that the crime of this case is not caused by the act of the defendant, but caused by the wind that the victim goes beyond his body fighting. The defendant asserts that the crime of this case was not caused by the act of the defendant, and that the crime of this case occurred.

However, it is difficult to view that the statements of the victim and witness F correspond to the overall facts charged, and there is a special reason to reject the credibility of the statements.

On the other hand, there is no objective evidence to support the defendant's assertion, and there is no evidence to see that the victim's blick disease affected the result of the injury in this case.

Comprehensively taking account of each of the above evidence, the Defendant is bound to have abused the victim as stated in the facts charged and inflicted an injury.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted, and all of the facts charged are convicted.

As a result of the crime, the degree of injury suffered by the victim is not less severe, and the victim wants to punish severe punishment, and the defendant's unfavorable circumstances and the defendant's primary crime is not recognized, and this case is contingent.