However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who operates a game hall in the name of “C” at the time of a show.

No person shall engage in a business of exchanging or arranging money exchange or re-purchase of tangible or intangible results, such as scores obtained through the use of game water.

Nevertheless, the Defendant from around March 16, 2018

4. Until November 18:10, by setting up 40 games in the above game room and the Spain social (class No.CC-N-161207-05) game (class No. CC-N-161207-05) and exchange the amount of money calculated by deducting the points obtained through the above game from 10% per point of charge by customers.

Accordingly, the defendant was a business to exchange tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement of D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, and M;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing site photographs on warrant execution;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 7 of the Act on the Promotion of the Alternative Game Industry, and Selection of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1) of the Confiscation Criminal Act is that the defendant does not have any criminal records exceeding the fine; the fact that the defendant's business period for the game room is not long and the defendant seems not to have much profits; and the defendant's age, sex, criminal conduct, environment, health conditions, circumstances leading to the crime, means and result of the crime and the circumstances after the crime, etc. are determined as the same in light of the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act.