beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.01.08 2015나55243

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of this court concerning the case of this case cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows.

The following part of the plaintiff's assertion of the 11 through 14 of "the defendant actually entered into a monthly rent contract (4 million won, monthly rent 400,000 won) on part of the housing of this case with "E where the defendant is the representative of D at the time when the housing of this case was registered in D" (the amount of 40 million won, monthly rent 4,000,000 won)" in collusion with E in collusion with E to make a false rent contract of KRW 40,000,000 (the date of September 12, 2007) for the lease deposit amount of KRW 40,000,000,000,000 paid to the defendant under the pretext of returning the lease deposit amount of KRW 40,000,000,000,000,000 to the defendant, which was the legitimate tenant of the defendant, and thus, the defendant incurred damages to the plaintiff from KRW 36,500,00,000,00.

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.