However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is the father and wife relationship B (math, 53 years of age).

1. Destruction and damage of special property;

A. On February 27, 2020, around 21:00 on February 27, 2020, the Defendant, at around the residence of the Defendant and the victim of the Seo-gu Incheon Seo-gu Seoul Building D, have a dispute over the externality of the victim.

In addition, a small-scale disease, which is a dangerous object on a customer, was left in a ward, and damaged the defendant's and the victim's jointly owned market price of 20,000 won.

B. On February 28, 2020, the Defendant, at around 01:30 on February 28, 202, has a dispute over the victim’s external appearance.

In addition, the defendant and the victim's joint ownership market value amounting to 30,000 won was damaged by duplicating electric utility, which is a dangerous object in the hexae.

2. The Defendant, who suffered special injury on February 28, 2020, appears to have a dispute over the victim’s external issues at around 02:30 on February 28, 2020.

The head of the victim's hair (not less than 4 cm in width, about 7 cm in length) was extracted from the body of the victim by taking the electric cryle, which is a dangerous object in the head of the hexae, and operating it on the head of the victim's head.

As a result, the defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim such as the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. B written statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (a photographs of a victim's damaged part);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 258-2 (1), 257 (1) (a point of special injury), and 369 (1) and 366 (a) of the Criminal Act for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion are on the floor.