A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000, and a fine of KRW 5,000,000, respectively. The Defendants are above.

Defendant

B is a taxi driver for the Co., Ltd., and Defendant A is a person engaged in wholesale business.

1. Defendant B

(a) From March 15, 2014, the Defendant was in violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) to 29 roads from March 15, 2014, Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do.

3. Until 16. 00:13, up to the 6181st century of the same area, C-cab was driven under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.10% by blood alcohol concentration.

B. When the Defendant was found to have been drinking due to a assault case like the above “A,” the Defendant asked A to “a to have the driver drive instead of the driver,” on the ground that it would hinder the revocation and suspension of the license, and caused the Defendant to accept the request, and again instigated the offender as if he had driven under the influence of alcohol to E during the police box belonging to the police box of the Pakistan Police Station.

2. Defendant A is driving a taxi for Postal Transport Business in front of the 6181 unit path in front of the 6181 unit of the 6181 unit in the 220th century at the 00:13 on March 15, 2014.

When the blood alcohol concentration of 0.10% was discovered in the state of drinking, the defendant was exposed to the phone call from the scene of the case, and the other party reported to the fighting box and operated the fighting box, and the other party was asked to ask the taxi company to "I would see that the license is a life and a relationship of living because the driver was replaced by the driver," and then the defendant was allowed to escape from the police box belonging to the Pacific Police Station on the day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. The circumstantial report on the driver and the report on detection of the driver;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Defendant A: Article 151(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 148-2(2)2 of the Road Traffic Act; Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act; Articles 151(1) and 31 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;