청소년보호법위반
All sentencing of each sentence against the Defendants shall be suspended.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B is a person who operates a cafeteria with the trade name "E" located in Busan Y, and the defendant A is an employee of the above cafeteria.
1. Although Defendant A was prohibited from selling a drug harmful to juveniles to juveniles, the Defendant sold the drug harmful to juveniles to F (18 tax), G (17 tax), H (17 tax), and I (18 tax) in the above “E” restaurant on November 7, 2015, the Defendant sold the drug harmful to juveniles to F (18 tax), G (17 tax), H (17 tax), and I (18 tax).
2. Defendant B, an employee of the Defendant, sold alcoholic beverages, which are harmful to juveniles, to juveniles, as described in paragraph (1).
Summary of Evidence
1. Each legal statement of witness F, G, H and I;
1. Results of inquiries into each of the facts regarding the KT, LG flus, SK Telecom in this Court;
1. A report on internal investigation (for juveniles to verify the place of drinking alcohol);
1. A restaurant photograph and a business report certificate;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on resident registration cards;
1. Article 59 Subparag. 6 and Article 28(1) of the Juvenile Protection Act; Defendant A who selects a fine: The main sentence of Article 62, Article 59 Subparag. 6, and Article 28(1) of the Act on Protection of Juveniles;
1. Defendant A who is to suspend the sentence: Fines of 700,000 won Defendant B: Fines of 50,000 won;
1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) (one-day calculation amount: one hundred thousand won) of the Criminal Act;
1. The Defendants: Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Do1488, Apr. 1, 2007